|Year : 2010 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 141-146
Detection of extended spectrum beta-lactamases in gram negative bacilli from clinical specimens in a teaching hospital in South eastern Nigeria
CN Akujobi, Chika P Ewuru
Department of Medical Microbiology/Parasitology, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, P.M.B 5025 Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria
|Date of Web Publication||27-Nov-2010|
C N Akujobi
Department of Medical Microbiology/Parasitology, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, P.M.B 5025 Nnewi, Anambra State
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Antimicrobial drug resistance seen among many gram-negative bacteria, especially those expressing the extended-spectrum β- lactamase (ESBL) enzymes that hydrolyze the expanded- spectrum cephalosporins has been on the increase. This has compromised treatment options and thus a threat to the containment of bacterial infections.
To determine the existence of the extended-spectrum β-lactamase enzymes in Nnewi, 250 clinical isolates of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas species from Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi were identified by conventional methods. These include Klebsiella species (96), E. coli (90), Pseudomonas species (37), Enterobacter species (13), Proteus species (6), Citrobacter species (5) and Salmonella species (3).
Antimicrobial drug susceptibility testing was carried out on all the isolates by the disc diffusion method. Extended Spectrum Beta- lactamases were detected by the double disc synergy test.
High level of antimicrobial resistance was noted in test organisms against some of the antimicrobial drugs: Ampicillin + Cloxacillin (93.2%), Tetracycline (90.8%), Streptomycin (82.4%), and Nalidixic acid (62%), and low level of resistance was observed against Ofloxacin (26.4%), Cefotaxime (28.8%) and Nitrofurantoin (28.8%). One hundred and forty four isolates (57.6%) were suspected ESBL-producers judged by their resistance to any of the third generation cephalosporins used but 40 (16%) actually produced the extended spectrum beta- lactamase enzymes.
This shows the existence of Extended Spectrum Beta- Lactamase producing gram negative organisms in Nnewi. Considering the treatment difficulties, as well as the high cost of treatment associated with these organisms, concerted efforts are needed to contain their spread.
Keywords: Extended spectrum Beta- lactamases, Gram negative bacill
|How to cite this article:|
Akujobi C N, Ewuru CP. Detection of extended spectrum beta-lactamases in gram negative bacilli from clinical specimens in a teaching hospital in South eastern Nigeria. Niger Med J 2010;51:141-6
|How to cite this URL:|
Akujobi C N, Ewuru CP. Detection of extended spectrum beta-lactamases in gram negative bacilli from clinical specimens in a teaching hospital in South eastern Nigeria. Niger Med J [serial online] 2010 [cited 2020 May 30];51:141-6. Available from: http://www.nigeriamedj.com/text.asp?2010/51/4/141/73282
| Introduction|| |
The gram negative bacilli especially Pseudomonas species and members of the family enterobacteriaceae are common causes of infections of many parts of the body. They account for more than 50% of all isolates in nosocomial infections  . Resistance to a variety of antimicrobial drugs commonly used for the treatment of infections with these pathogens have been reported , . This phenomenon has compounded treatment of these infections and thus has become a challenge to global public health , . Many of the resistant cases have been attributed to the production of Extended Spectrum Beta- Lactamases (ESBLs). These are a group of enzymes that enable the bacteria possessing them to hydrolyze and thus confer resistance to expanded spectrum oxyimino- cephalosporins, penicillins and aztreonam among enterobacteriaceae and other gram- negative bacteria. It is indeed the largest source of resistance presently  . The ESBL enzymes are most commonly produced by Klebsiella species and Escherichia coli, but may also occur in other gram-negative bacteria including Salmonella, Proteus, Pseudomonas, Citrobacter, Morganella, Serratia,and Shigella species , .
Many clinical laboratories are not fully aware of the importance of ESBL and a serious challenge facing clinical laboratories is that clinically relevant ESBL- mediated resistance is not always detectable in routine susceptibility tests ,, . The inability of the clinical laboratory to accurately detect and report ESBLs has resulted in avoidable therapeutic failures in patients ,, , and outbreaks of multidrug resistant gram- negative pathogens that require expensive control efforts  .
Despite the wide spread reports of the existence of ESBL and its clinical significance in Europe, America and Asia ,, , there is limited report of its existence in sub- Saharan Africa, particularly in Nigeria  . The few reports of its presence in Nigeria were in Lagos and Ibadan, South-western Nigeria ,, , with little or no reports at all in other parts of Nigeria particularly the South-Eastern part of the country.
This study was therefore carried out to detect the presence of the extended-spectrum beta- lactamases among gram- negative bacilli from clinical specimens in Nnewi, South-Eastern Nigeria, using the double disc synergy procedure.
| Materials and Methods|| |
The study area is Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria. The town is the location of the Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, a tertiary health care facility that serves as a referral centre for Anambra and neighboring states.
Sample and sampling technique
Two hundred and fifty gram-negative bacterial isolates from the Microbiology laboratory of the hospital were used for the study from October, 2006 to March, 2007. The isolates were obtained from the following clinical specimens: urine, urethral swabs, vaginal swabs, semen, sputum, stool, ear swab, wound swab and Pus.
The organisms were identified to the genus level by standard microbiological methods.
They include: Klebsiella spp. (96,) Escherichia coli (90), Pseudomonas spp. (37), Enterobacter spp. (13), Citrobacter spp. (5), Proteus spp.6, and Salmonella spp (3) Control strains were Escherichia coli (ATCC 6571) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853)
Suspension of the test organism was prepared in sterile peptone water to the turbidity of 0.5 McFarland standard No 1. The suspension was then inoculated evenly over the surface of Mueller-Hinton agar plate and antimicrobial disks were placed on the plates. The plates were incubated at 35° C over night. The zones of inhibition were read and interpreted as: Sensitive (s), Resistant (R) or Intermediate (I) according to standard interpretative chart.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
Antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed on each of the isolates by disc diffusion method as recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, now Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, CLSI  .
The antimicrobial susceptibility disks used include: Ceftazidime (CAZ) 30μg, Cefotaxime (CTX) 30μg, Ceftriaxone (CRO) 30μg, Amoxicillin plus Clavulanic acid (AMC) 30μg,(all from Oxoid Laboratories, UK), then, Ampicillin plus cloxacillin (APX) 30μg, Streptomycin (STR) 25μg, Gentamycin (GEN) 10μg, Ofloxacin (OFL) 5μg, Ciprofloxacin (CPX) 5μg, Nitrofurantoin (NIT) 20μg, nalidixic acid (NAL) 30μg, Colistin (COL) 5μg, Tetracycline (TET) 25μg (from Abtek Biologicals Ltd USA)
Detection of Extended-spectrum Beta-Lactamase
The presence of Extended- Spectrum Beta- Lactamase (ESBL) was detected by the Double Disk Synergy Test (DDST) ,, . A suspension of the test organism was inoculated on Mueller- Hinton agar.
A disk containing 30μg Amoxicillin plus Clavulanic acid was placed centrally on the plate. Disks containing Ceftazidime, Cefotaxime and Ceftriaxone were placed round the Amoxicillin + Clavulanic acid disk at a distance of 20mm (centre to centre) from the latter. The plates were incubated over night at 35° C. The patterns of zones of inhibition were noted. Isolates that exhibited a distinct shape/size with potentiation towards Amoxicillin + Clavulanate disk were considered ESBL producers.
| Results|| |
A total of 250 clinical isolates of gram- negative bacteria (Pseudomonas species and members of the family enterobacteriaceae) from urogenital, stool, respiratory tract and throat swab specimens, ear swab, pus, wound or aspirate were tested. Two hundred and three isolates were from urogenital tract, 18 from respiratory tract, 5 from stool, 19 from wound/pus/ aspirate and 7 from ear swab as in [Table 1]. Varying degrees of resistance was noticed with the various groups of antimicrobial drugs used. Among the cephalosporins, 113 of all the isolates were either resistant (34.4%) or of intermediate susceptibility (10.8%) to ceftazidime, where as ofloxacin had the least resistant isolates compared to the 13 antimicrobial drugs used.
Sixty-six (26.6%) of the isolates were resistant to Ofloxacin and 31 (12.4%) were intermediate [Table 2]. Among the aminoglycosides, 132 (52.8%) of the isolates were resistant to Gentamycin and 36 (14.4%) were intermediate it. Furthermore, 123 isolates (49.2%) were resistant to Amoxicillin + Clavulanic acid, while 31 isolates (12.4%) were intermediate to the drug. Most of the isolates were resistant to Ampicillin+Cloxacillin (233; 93.2%) and Tetracycline (227; 90.8%) [Table 3].
|Table 2: Overall susceptibility pattern to the cephalosporins and quinolones|
Click here to view
Of all the isolates 224 (89.6%) were resistant to e" 5 of the 13 antimicrobial drugs used. The antibiogram also shows that 65 (26%) of all the isolates were resistant to all three cephalosporins used, 38 (15.2%) were resistant to a single cephalosporin, and 41 (16.4%) were resistant to any two of the three cephalosporins. One hundred and six (42.4%) of the isolates were susceptible to all the three cephalosporins [Table 4] and picture 1, picture 2. [Figure 1], [Figure 2]).
|Figure 2: ESBL-producing Synergy with all 3 cephalosporins Arrows indicate synergy|
Click here to view
One hundred and forty four (57.6%) isolates were resistant to one, two or the three cephalosporins used. Forty of these (16%) of all isolates were ESBL-producing [Table 4]. None of the 6 isolates of Proteus species produced ESBL.
Among the 40 ESBL-producing isolates, 32 (80%) were detected by Ceftazidime, 26 (65%) by Cefotaxime and 24 (60%) by Ceftriaxone, 13 (32.5%) of the ESBL-producing isolates showed synergy with only one of the three cephalosporins, while 27 (67.5%) of them showed synergy with either two or all three cephalosporins. Picture 3 [Figure 3]. Eighteen (7.2%) of all the isolates (11 of which were ESBL-producing) were resistant to all 13 antimicrobial drugs used. Another 19 (7.6%) isolates were resistant to all but one antimicrobial drug. Seven (7) of these 19 isolates were also ESBL-producing. 39 (97.5%) of the 40 ESBL-producing isolates were resistant to e" 7 antimicrobial drugs. 13 (32.5%) of the 40 ESBL-producing isolates were susceptible to Colistin and 16 (40%) were susceptible to at least one of the quinolones.
| Discussion|| |
From this study, Klebsiella species and Escherichia coli were the most frequently isolated gram-negative organism from clinical specimens especially from the urogenital tract. It was also observed that Pseudomonas species caused significant urinary tract infections as well as infections of wound and external ear.
None of the isolates tested was susceptible to all the antimicrobial drugs used in the study. Two hundred and forty four isolates showed significant multi-drug resistance from 5 to all 13 antimicrobial drugs used. Three isolates were resistant to only one of the 13 antimicrobial drugs; another 2 were resistant to only 2 antimicrobial drugs. Five isolates were resistant to only 3 antimicrobial drugs and 26 isolates were resistant to only 4 antimicrobial drugs. Of particular note is an E. coli strain isolated from the stool of a year old child with diarrhoea that was resistant to all but one antimicrobial drug (Ceftriaxone). The quinolones (Ofloxacin and Ciprofloxacin) have up to 26.4% and 37.6% resistance respectively among the isolates and this is a cause for concern because many clinicians fall back on the quinolones for the treatment of gram-negative pathogens in the face of multi-drug resistance  . Increased resistance to ciprofloxacin had been reported earlier in Nigeria by Aibinu et al,, who discovered that 18% of all ESBL-producing Enterobacter species were resistant to Ciprofloxacin. In another report, Aibinu et al  discovered a contrasting situation with Klebsiella pneumoniae in which all ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae was susceptible to Ciprofloxacin. Very recently, Doi et al  reported two different isolates of community acquired E. coli that were resistant to ciprofloxacin and other drugs in USA. Paterson et al  had reported that globally 18% of all ESBL- producers were resistant to ciprofloxacin. But today, 7 years after this report, this present study found 37.6% resistance to Ciprofloxacin among ESBL producers in Nnewi. This means that the resistance phenomenon is on the increase. This increasing resistance to several antimicrobial drugs is due to inappropriate usage of antimicrobial drugs (such as over use, misuse, suboptimal dosage and non compliance with treatment duration) which leads to selection pressure.
This study has identified the presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase among clinical isolates in Nnewi. Forty (16%) of the 250 isolates tested were ESBL producers. Escherichia coli has the highest number of ESBL-producing isolates with 18 (29%) out of the 90 isolates tested followed by Klebsiella species follow with 11 (11.4%) out of the 96 isolates showing ESBL-production. This conforms to the findings of Kumar et al  that more E. coli than Klebsiella possess ESBL. For the rest of the isolates, Enterobacter species had 2 out of the 13 isolates (15.4%) producing ESBL. Aibinu et al  had earlier reported 8 out of 40 isolates (20%) of Enterobacter species that produced ESBL enzymes in Lagos Nigeria. It is worthy of note that no ESBL-producing isolate was discovered among the 6 isolates of Proteus species tested. Out of the 40 ESBL-producing isolates, 80% (32) were detected by Ceftazidime, 65% (26) by Cefotaxime and 60% (24) by Ceftriaxone. This means that Ceftazidime is the best ESBL screening agent among the three Cephalosporins used in the study.
A total of 144 isolates were resistant to at least one β-lactam antibiotics. By NCCLS definition, these are suspected ESBL producers. Only 40 (27.8%) of these were actually ESBL producers. The reason may be that other resistant enzymes other than ESBL such as'Inhibitor-Resistant β-lactamases' (IRT) could have been present in these ESBL-non-producing but β-lactam resistant isolates. Some strains have also been reported as producing both ESBL and the inhibitor-resistant β-lactamase AmpC which prevents the recognition of the ESBL phenotypically. It should be noted that except one of the 40 ESBL-producing isolates that was resistant to only 4 antimicrobial drugs, the rest showed resistance to 7 or more antimicrobial drugs. This conforms to the findings of Aibinu et al  who reported that all ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae are multi-drug resistant. Pope et al also reported an ESBL- producing Klebsiella pneumoniae that co-produced KpC carbapenemase that was resistant to all antibiotics used. While 13 (32.5%) of the 40 ESBL-producing isolates showed synergy with only one cephalosporin, 27 (67.5%) showed synergy with either two or all three cephalosporins. This may suggest the presence of multiple enzymes in the isolates, as the cephalosporinase that hydrolyzes Ceftazidime may be different from that which hydrolyzes Cefotaxime and Ceftriaxone  .
In conclusion, there is the existence of Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase producing gram negative organisms in Anambra State, Nigeria. Health care practitioners are therefore advised to be careful on the use and abuse of antimicrobials to minimize the spread. The study detected the ESBL phenotypes and efforts are on the way to determine the ESBL genotypes.
| References|| |
|1.||Talaro K., Talaro A.: Foundations in Microbiology. 2nd edition. WCB/McGraw-Hill USA. 1996: 609-629 |
|2.||Okeke I. N., Lamikanra A., Edelman R.: Socioeconomic and behavioral factors leading to acquired bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents in developing countries. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 1999; 5 : 18-27. |
|3.||Sheers P. : Antibiotic resistance in the tropics: Epidemiology and surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in the tropics. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2001; 95: 127-30. |
|4.||World Health Organization: Global strategy for containment of antimicrobial resistance, Geneva: The Organization, 2001. |
|5.||Byarugaba D. K.: A view on antimicrobial resistance in developing countries and responsible risk factors: Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2004; 24: 105-10. |
|6.||Paterson D. L., Bonomo R. A.: ESBLs: a clinical update. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2005; 18: 657-86 |
|7.||Goussard S., Courvalin P.: Updated sequence information for TEM-beta-lactamase genes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1999; 43: 367-70. |
|8.||Heritage J., M'Zali F. H., Gascoyne-Biniz D., Hawkey P. M.: Evolution and spread of SHV-extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in gram-negative bacteria. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1999; 44: 309-18. |
|9.||Thomson K. S.: Controversis about Extended-Spectrum and AmpC Beta-Lactamases. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2001; 7(2) . |
|10.||Catagay A. A., Kocagoz T., Eraksoy H.: Dio- sensimedia: a novel culture medium for rapid detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2003; 3: 22. |
|11.||Stevenson K. B., Samore M., Barbera J., Moore J. W. , Hannah E., Houck P.: Detection of antimicrobial resistance by small rural hospital microbiology laboratories: comparison of survey responses with current NCCL laboratory standards. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2003; 47: 303-11. |
|12.||Brun-Buisson C., Legrand P., Philippon A., Montravers F., Asquer F., Duval J.: Transferable enzymatic resistance to third generation cephalosporins during nosocomial outbreak of multi-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: Lancet. 1987; ii: 302-6. |
|13.||Casellas J. M., Goldberg M.: Incidence of strains producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in Argentina. Infection. 1989; 17: 434-6. |
|14.||Paterson D., Ko W., Von-Gottberg A., Mohapatra S., Casellas J., Mulazimoglu L: In-vitro susceptibility and clinical outcomes of bacteremia due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1998; 27: 956. |
|15.||Thomson K. S., Prevan P. M., Sanders C. C.: Novel plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases in enterobacteriaceae: emerging problems for new beta-lactam antibiotics In: Remington JS, Swartz MN (eds). Current clinical topics in infectious diseases. Cambridge, Blackwell Science, Inc. 1996; 151-163. |
|16.||Shaw P. W., Stille W: Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains more susceptible to cefoxitin than to the 3rd generation cephalosporins (Letter) J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1983; 11: 597-8. |
|17.||Jarlier V. , Nicolas M. H., Fournier G., Phillippon: Extended broad sprectrum beta- lactamases conferring transferable resistance to newer beta-lactam agents in Enterobacteriaceae: hospital prevalence susceptibility patterns. Rev. Infect. Dis. 1998; 10: 867-78. |
|18.||Quinn J. P., Miyashiro D., Sahm D., Flamm R., Bush K.: Novel plasmid-mediated beta-lactamase (TEM-10) conferring selective resistance to ceftazidime and aztreonam in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1989; 33: 1451-6. |
|19.||Thiery F., Arlet G. , Gautier V., Talarmin A., Bercion R.: Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, Central African Republic. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006; 12(5): 863-5. |
|20.||Aibinu I. E., Ohaegbulam V. C., Adenipekun E. O., Ogunsola F. T., Odugbemi T. O., Mee B. J.: Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Enzymes in clinical isolates of Enterobacter species from Lagos, Nigeria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003; 41: 2197-200. |
|21.||Aibinu I., Fashae K., Ogunsola F., Odugbemi T., Mee B. J.: Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from septicaemic children in Ibadan, Nigeria. Nig. J. Health and Bio. Sci. 2004: 3(2); 79-8. |
|22.||National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, tenth informational supplement M100-S15. Wayne (PA): The Institute, 2005. |
|23.||Livermore D. M., Brown D. F.: Detection of Beta-Lactamases- mediated resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2001; 48 (suppl S1): 59-64. |
|24.||Patterson J. E.: Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-producing gram-negative bacilli. Seminars in Infect. Control. 2001; 1(3): 184-90. |
|25.||Khaneja M., Naprawa J., Kumar A., Piecuch S.: Successful treatment of late onset infection due to resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in an extremely low birth weight infant using ciprofloxacin. J.Perinatol. 1999; 19: 311-4. |
|26.||Doi Y, Adams J, O'Keefe A, Quereshi Z, Ewan L, Paterson DL: Community acquired Extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producers. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2007; 13(7): 1121-3 |
|27.||Paterson D. L., Mulazimoglu, Casellas J. M.: Epidemiology of ciprofloxacin resistance and its relationship to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates causing bacteremia. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2000; 30: 473-8. |
|28.||Kumar M. S., Lakshmi V., Rajagopalan R.: Occurrence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae species isolated at a tertiary care institute. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 2006; 24: 208-11. |
|29.||Pope J, Adams J, Doi Y, Szabo D, Paterson DL: Kpc-type beta-lactamase; rural Pennysylvania. Emerg. Infect.Dis. 2006; 12(10): 1613-4. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]