Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Users Online: 2719

 

Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Advertise Contacts Login 
     

  Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 61  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 206-209  

Care of the sick newborn in a cottage hospital level in a developing country


1 Department of Paediatrics, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria
2 Department of Community Health, Shell Petroleum and Development Company, Abuja, Nigeria
3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Benin, Benin, Nigeria
4 Department of Paediatrics, Obio Cottage Hospital, Obio/Akpor LGA, Rivers State, Nigeria

Date of Submission14-Sep-2019
Date of Decision26-Sep-2019
Date of Acceptance20-Jun-2020
Date of Web Publication4-Aug-2020

Correspondence Address:
Prof. Emmanuel E. Ekanem
Department of Paediatrics, University of Calabar, Calabar
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/nmj.NMJ_162_19

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Introduction: Neonatal morbidity and mortality are high in Nigeria. The establishment of more centers that could offer adequate management of high-risk pregnancies and neonates is essential. Objectives: This study seeks to describe sick newborn care at the cottage hospital level in Southern Nigeria with the aim of drawing lessons that may be useful to similar environments. Subjects and Methods: A description of facility upgrading and staff training in perinatal care at a public-private partnership cottage hospital with a robust community health insurance scheme in Nigeria is made. A retrospective descriptive study of the morbidity and outcomes of admitted neonates in the facility between March 2016 and February 2017 was made. Results: Out of 3630 babies born in the facility (302 per month), 189 were admitted, yielding an admission rate of 52.1/1000 live births. The main morbidities were neonatal hypoglycemia (32.4%), preterm low-birth weight (24.9%), neonatal sepsis (22.8%), and neonatal jaundice (12.7%). Sixteen of the 109 neonates died giving a mortality rate of 8.5%. The main causes of deaths were birth asphyxia (7 or 43.8%), meconium aspiration (6 or 37.5%), and congenital malformation (3 or 18.8%).Conclusion and Recommendations: The neonatal admission and mortality rates are quite low in this cottage hospital and similar to the situation even in developed environments. This salutary scenario is probably due to good antenatal and perinatal care, and a robust community health insurance scheme which enhances services uptake and public–private partnership which engenders infrastructure expansion and maintenance. This model is recommended for the hospitals in our region.

Keywords: Cottage hospital, morbidity, newborn care


How to cite this article:
Ekanem EE, Fajola AO, Ande AB, Ikeagwu GO, Anidima TE, Umejiego CN, Usman R. Care of the sick newborn in a cottage hospital level in a developing country. Niger Med J 2020;61:206-9

How to cite this URL:
Ekanem EE, Fajola AO, Ande AB, Ikeagwu GO, Anidima TE, Umejiego CN, Usman R. Care of the sick newborn in a cottage hospital level in a developing country. Niger Med J [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 19];61:206-9. Available from: http://www.nigeriamedj.com/text.asp?2020/61/4/206/291344


   Introduction Top


Globally, neonatal deaths accounted for 38% of childhood deaths in 2000.[1] In Nigeria, neonatal mortality rate stagnated at 41/1000 live births between 1990 and 2013,[2] the major causes being birth asphyxia, prematurity, and low birth weight.[3],[4]

Improvement of the quality of maternal and child health services,[2] and more specifically, the establishment of more centers that could manage high-risk pregnancies and neonates are needed.[3]

This article describes the efforts at improved sick newborn care in a Community Cottage Hospital in Nigeria. It is hoped that the aspects of our experience can serve as a model for similar communities.


   Subjects and Methods Top


This was a retrospective, descriptive study of all ill neonates managed at the Obio Cottage Hospital (OCH) Obio/Akpor Local Government Area (LGA) of Rivers State in Southern Nigeria from March 2016 to February 2017. OCH was established in 1978 by the government of Rivers State as a Primary Health Center providing preventive and curative health care services mainly to the indigenes of Obio/Akpor LGA of the state. In 2008, Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) started supporting the facility as part of its social infrastructure programme. SPDC upgraded and rehabilitated the facility, converting the four bed health center operating in a twin bungalow with 13 staff to a 56 bed facility with staff strength of 164, including 13 doctors and 58 nurses. It has an Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department with antenatal care (ANC), delivery services, and an obstetrics theater. It also has a children's ward. A small neonatal unit was established in 2016, equipped with three infant incubators, four cots, three oxygen concentrators, and bubble continuous positive airway pressure ventilation, and exchange blood transfusion sets, pulse oxymeters among other basic equipment. The obstetric theater is equipped with radiant warmers and neonatal resuscitation sets. Annually, the SPDC engages an obstetrician and a pediatrician on sabbatical appointment to oversee services in the facility.

To activate the newborn unit, the medical and nursing staff were put through basic training with focus on antenatal care, labor management including active management and use of partograph, neonatal resuscitation, incubator care, feeding of the newborn, and exchange blood transfusion, among others. Solar power had been introduced to ensure the uninterrupted power supply in the hospital. This has been described elsewhere.[5] SPDC had also introduced a Community Health Insurance Scheme in the center in 2010 which has markedly improved access to services. This has been described in previous publications.[6],[7]

All neonates managed in the newborn unit, children's ward, and with their mothers in the postnatal wards in the period were recruited into the study. Their gender and indications for admission, places and modes of delivery, clinical and laboratory diagnoses, management and outcome were documented.

The data were extracted from the case files and entered into a spreadsheet and checked for accuracy. Data were then transferred to Starta 12 software (STATA corp, Texas, USA) and analyzed using simple proportions and tables. Ethical approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Akwa-Ibom State, Nigeria.


   Results Top


During this period, 3630 babies were delivered at the OCH. Of these 2405 (66.3%) had vaginal delivery and 1225 (33.7%) were delivered by cesarean section.

One hundred and eighty-nine neonates were admitted in the facility during the period; 109 (57.7%) were males while 80 (42.3%) were females. This gave a neonatal admission rate of 52.1/1000 live births.

All the admitted neonates were delivered at OCH; 80 (42.3%) by spontaneous vaginal delivery, 98 (51.9%) by cesarean section, and 1 (0.5%) by assisted vaginal delivery. There was no information for 10 (5.3%) babies.

The mean birth weight was 3.0 ± 0.8 kg. One hundred and sixteen or 61.4% had normal birth weight (2.5–4.0 kg), 51 (27.0) were low birth weight, and 1 (0.5%) very low birth weight (1.0–1.4 kg). Eighteen (9.5%) were macrosomic (>4.0 kg). There was no extreme low birth weight. There was no record for three (1.6%) infants.

Indications for admission/special care

[Table 1] shows the indications for admission/special care of the neonates. About a third (32.4%) was managed for neonatal hypoglycemia, about quarter each for preterm low birth weight (47 or 24.9%) and neonatal sepsis (43 or 22.8%). The other important indications for admission were perinatal asphyxia (29 or 15.3%), neonatal jaundice (24 or 12.7%), and birth asphyxia and meconium aspiration (9.2%).
Table 1: Sociodemographic and delivery characteristics of neonates in care at Obio Cottage Hospital (n=189)

Click here to view


Outcome

The mean duration of stay in care was 6.5 ± 1.8 days with 170 (89.9%) staying 7 days or less and 19 (10.1%) more than a week. One hundred and fifty-four (81.5%) were discharged home; 4 (2.1%) referred to tertiary hospital while 8 (4.2%) left against medical advice. Sixteen (8.5%) died giving a neonatal mortality rate for this facility of 4.4/1000 live births. There was no information on outcome for 7 (3.7%). The important identified causes of deaths [Table 2] were birth asphyxia (7 or 43.8%), meconium aspiration (6 or 37.5%), and congenital malformations (3 or 18.8%). Causes could not be identified for 2 or 12.5% of the neonates. Four (25.0%) of the deaths occurred within the first 24 h of admission and 11 (68.8%) within 48 h: one (6.3%) each occurred from the 3rd day to the 6th day of admission, and one (6.3%) on the 14th day of admission.
Table 2: Indications for admission/special care of neonates at Obio Cottage Hospital

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The delivery of 3630 babies over a 12-month period (302/month) in this cottage hospital indicates a high level of patronage. This may be attributed to the high level of patient satisfaction at the facility earlier reported[7],[8] and the community health insurance also described elsewhere. In this scheme, community members pay a yearly premium of ten thousand naira only to access care all year round at the facility.[6],[7] The cesarean section rate was 33.7%. In Sokoto, Northern Nigeria, Daniel, and Singh reported an overall cesarean section rate of 11.3% with the highest rate of 44.6% among the primipara.[9] In Makurdi, in the middle belt of Nigeria, Hembah-Hilekaan et al.[10] recorded a rate of 19.3% in 630 deliveries, and Eleje et al.[11] a rate of 18.5 at Nnewi, Eastern Nigeria. The cesarean section rate of more than 30% in the current study, therefore, appears relatively high and warrants investigation. This was not within the scope of this study. Interestingly, a similar rate of 30.3% was recently reported at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, a tertiary facility in the same city.[12]

The admission rate in the present study was 52.1/1000 live births. This compares favorably with an admission rate of 43.1/1000 normal-birth-weight-newness and overall rate of 64.0–77.9/1000 live births over a 6-year period for the United State newborns.[13] In Australia, the nationwide admission rate from 1999 to 2002 was 89/1000 live births for term babies of primiparous women and 63/1000 live births for those of multiparas.[14] Sandal et al.[15] reported an overall admission rate of 97/1000 live births at Ankara, Turkey. The low admission rate at OCH is likely indicative of the quality of perinatal services in the center and patronage of ANC services, particularly following the community health insurance scheme earlier reported.[6],[8]

The important causes of neonatal morbidity in the present study were hypoglycemia, birth asphyxia, low-birth-weight sepsis, and neonatal jaundice, in that order. This is similar to the pattern in the region but with some important differences. In Ife, Western Nigeria, neonatal jaundice, (45.6%) low birth weight (18.6%), birth asphyxia (14.2%), and neonatal sepsis were the main causes of neonatal morbidity among inborn neonates.[16] In Calabar, South-South Nigeria, the major causes were sepsis (27.4%), jaundice (21.0%), and low birth weight.[17] In two studies from Northern Nigeria, the main causes were sepsis and birth asphyxia, accounting for about a third each.[18],[19] Sepsis did not rank high at OCH and the numbers and proportion with asphyxia were comparatively low. This pattern contrasts with the reports from Calabar,[17] Azare,[18] and Birnin Kudu[19] where sepsis and asphyxia topped the ranking. Apart from the relatively low incidence of jaundice at OCH, the morbidity pattern is more akin to the situation at a tertiary health facility in Ife, Western Nigeria, and may be reflective of the quality of ante-natal and perinatal care at the center. Neonatal hypoglycemia in this study was defined as a random blood sugar < 2.2 mmol/L.[20] The Nigerian studies from Ife,[16] Calabar,[17] Azare,[18] and Birnin-Kudu[19] did not mention hypoglycemia. This may be because at OCH all newborns are routinely screened for hypoglycemia with the first 24 h of life, which may not be the case in these other centers but should be recommended. However, Frank-Briggs in a study of cord blood glucose recorded a prevalence of hypoglycemia of 28.3% in Port Harcourt, same city as this study.[21] Dedeke etal.[22] recorded a point-of-admission neonatal hypoglycemia rate of 32.7% among sick babies, being associated with 32.7% of the deaths. At Tamale, Ghana, Walana etal.[23] reported that hypoglycemia was responsible for 1.3% of the neonatal mortality while contributing 1.7% to morbidity.

At OCH, hypoglycemia did not contribute to mortality, probably because of early detection arising from routine checks. The mortality rate among admitted neonates in Tamale, Ghana, was 16.0% with prematurity/low-birth weight being the main contributor (44.8%). This contrasts with a mortality of 8.5% at OCH with low-birth weight ranking low. This may be reflective of good ANC at OCH. Although small in absolute numbers, the high ranking and case-fatality rate of meconium aspiration require attention. Similarly, the mortality rate of 8.5% at OCH is a lot better than the 22.1% reported at Kampala, Uganda and attributed mainly to prematurity and its complications, and birth asphyxia. In Nnewi, Eastern Nigeria, a mortality rate of 19.4% was reported with prematurity (30.7%), asphyxia (24.1%), sepsis (19.3%) being the main contributors.[3] In Calabar, South-South Nigeria, a mortality rate of 19.3% was recorded with neonatal tetanus (20.9%) septicemia (19.6%), birth asphyxia (23.3%), and low birth weight (19.0%) the main culprits.[4] Neonatal tetanus is certainly preventable with good antenatal and perinatal care and was not reported at OCH. The burden of prematurity and sepsis in our resource-limited environments can be reduced with high uptake of antenatal and perinatal care.

It has been asked if facility-based neonatal care in resource-limited environments is keeping pace with the current challenge to reduce neonatal deaths in resource-limited environments.[24] Experience at OCH, South-South Nigeria indicates that enhancing ANC would reduce the burden in the limited neonatal units in our region. Improvement in the infrastructure of the facility and the community health insurance scheme for the catchment community have made ANC attractive and accessible to the community.[6],[7] Provision of regular electric power supply, which is a rarity in hospitals in developing countries,[5] has further enhanced utilization and services of the center. The public–private partnership has enhanced expansion and maintenance of the facility, and the availability of high caliber staff.

Training and retraining of staff on focus ANC, conduct of labor, and peri-natal have reduced the need for intensive neonatal care. Thus, the basic equipment of the neonatal unit was able to largely cope with the burden of neonatal morbidity. It has been argued that simple and basic equipment can salvage neonates in our region.[25]


   Conclusion Top


Neonatal admission, neonatal morbidity, and mortality rates at OCH, South-South Nigeria are good and comparable to the rates even in more developed environments. Public–private sector partnership, high uptake of ANC hinged on community health insurance care, training and retraining of staff, and basic affordable and sustainable equipment may have contributed to this scenario. Effective newborn care is feasible even at the cottage hospital level. We recommend this model to similar environments.

This study covered only a single year period, which is a limitation. A study covering more years will need to be conducted to ensure a larger study population and detect any trend.

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to all the records personnel, laboratory staff, nurses, doctors and other staff of the ante-natal, labor, and neonatal units of the OCH. Our thanks also go to all the staff of the Community Health Department of SPDC, Nigeria, the supervising department of the hospital.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J, (Lancet Neonatal Surveying Steering Team). Neonatal Survival. 4 Million Neonatal Deaths. When? Where? Why? March, 2005. Available from: http://www.thelancet.com. [Last accessed on 2016 Oct 10].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Akinyemi JO, Bangboye EA, Ayeni O. Trends in neonatal mortality in Nigeria and effects of biodemographic and maternal characteristics. BMC Paediatrics 2015;15:36.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Ezechukwu CC, Ugochukwu EF, Egbonu I, Chukwuka JO. Risk factors for neonatal mortality in a regional tertiary hospital in Nigeria. Nig J Clin Pract 2004;7:50-2.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Udo JJ, Anah MU, Ochigbo SO, Etuk IS, Ekanem AD. Neonatal morbidity and mortality in Calabar, Nigeria: A hospital-based study. Niger J Clin Pract 2008;11:285-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Ekanem EE, Fajola AO, Ogbimi R, Ogieva JI. Use of solar energy for the provision of cost effective and environmentally friendly power supply in health facilities in the developing world – Leasons from a community cottage hospital in southern Nigeria. Int J Res Sci Mgt 2017;4:32-7.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Ogbonna C, Nwagbabo F, Fakunle B. Utilization and perception of community health insurance scheme services by enrollees in obio cottage hospital, Port Harcourt, Nigeria. J Comm Med Pri Hlth Care 2012;24:1-2.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Ogbonna C, Nwagagbo F, Ajiboye A. Community Health Insurance Scheme in Obio/Akpor LGA, Port Harcourt, Rivers State. 2nd Annual Programme Evaluation Report. Available from: https://www.filepicker.io>api>file. [Last accessed on 2018 Jul 18].  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Ekanem EE, Usman R, Ande B, Fajola AO. A study of solicited commentaries on service delivery in a community cottage hospital. Nig Med Pract 2017;72:87-90.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Daniel CN, Singh S. Caesarean delivery: An experience from a tertiary institution in north western Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract 2016;19:18-24.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
10.
Hilekaan SK, Ojabo A, Idogah S. Caesarean section rate in a tertiary hospital in Makurdi, North-Central Nigeria. General Med 2012;3:183.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Eleje GU, Udigwe GO, Akabuike JC, Eke AC, Eke NO, Umeobika JC. The rate of caesarean section in Nnewi, Nigeria: A 10 year review. Afri Med J 2010;1:11-4.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
John CO, Alegbeleye JO. Caesarean delivery at a teaching hospital, South – South Nigeria: A five year review. IJTDH 2017;21:1-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Harrison W, Goodman D. epidemiologic trands in neonatal intensive care, 2007 – 2012. JAMA Pediatr 2015;169:855-62.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Tracy SK, Tracy MB, Sullivan E. Admission of term infants to neonatal intensive care: A population-based study. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey 2008;63:217-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Sandal G, Erdeve O, Oguz SS, Uras N, Akar M, Dilmsn U. The admission rate in neonatal intensive care units of newborns born to adolescent mothers. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med 2011;24:1019-21.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Owa JA, Osinaike Al. Neonatal morbidity and mortality in Nigeria. Ind J Pediatr 1998;65:441-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Udo JJ, Anah MU, Ochigbo SO, Etuck IS, Ekanem AD. Neonatal morbidity and mortality in Calabar, Nigeria: A hospital-based study. Nigerian J Clinical Practice 2008;11:285-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Imoudu IA, Ahmad H, Yusuf MO, Makarfi HU, Umara T. An analysis of neonatal morbidity and mortality in Azare, north-eastern Nigeria. IOSR – JMDS 2014; 13: 25-28.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Abdullahi UI. Neonatal morbidity and mortality in a rural tertiary hospital in Nigeria. CHRISMED J. Hlth Res 2018;5:8-10.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
MSD. Neonatal hypoglycaemia-Pediatrics-MSD. Manual Professional Edition. Available from: https://www.msdmanuals.com>pediatrics. [Last accessed on 2020 Jun 15].  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Frank-Briggs AI, Ojule AC, Nkanginieme KE. Neonatal hypoglycaemia: Prevalence and clinical manifestations in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. PHMJ 2008;2:166-70.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Dedeke IO, Okeniyi JA, Owa JA, Oyedeji GA. Point-of-admission neonatal hypoglycaemia in a Nigerian tertiary hospital: Incidence, risk factors and outcome. Nig J Paediatr 2011;38:2.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Walana W, Acquah Ekuban KS, Abdul-Mumin A, Naafu B, Aruk E, Vicar KE. Pattern, causes and treatment outcomes of neonatal admission in the tamale teaching hospital. Clinics Mother Child Health 2016;13:2.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Abdallah Y, Namiiro F, Mugalu J, Nankunda J, Vaucher Y, McMillan D. Is facility based neonatal care in low resource setting keeping pace? A glance at Uganda's National Referral Hospital. Afr Health Sci 2016;16:347-55.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Ekanem EE. Cheap and proven alternative technologies may salvage our children. Niger Med J 1996;31:82-3.  Back to cited text no. 25
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Subjects and Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed110    
    Printed3    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal